Introduction
In the field of development, there is no perfect strategy which can satisfy the needs of all the actors involved and solve the world poverty likewise. All methodologies and approaches which have been implemented so far have their own strength and weaknesses. However, what makes a development strategy “best” is that it exerts potential capability to include most of the needs and varieties of development obstacles from all sides (donors and recipient countries) and strive to achieve better progress.
Various strategies were formulated and implemented in different epoch since development became the global issue, nevertheless, most of them failed to make happen the targeted goal in a given period to our world. Various reasons can be raised for the failure of these strategies, yet, their incompatibility with the nature and characteristics of the real problems of each developing country is considered to be the main factor. This problem still exists in the global development strategies like the Millennium Development Goal, Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers and the High Forum for Aid Effectiveness.
The Millennium Development Goal is considered to be one of the best among the other strategies which globally implemented in order to realize better development. The goals appear to have been more influential than most other attempts at international target setting in the field of development, at least at the level of international discourse (R. Manning, 2010, pp.1). With its eight major goal, 21 targets and 60 indicators, the millennium development goals are influencing the policies and implementations of recipient and donor countries in different ways. However, there are some groups which are strongly criticizing the nature and formation of MDGs in the way that the goals potentially determined on specific areas of development and neglected other parts concurrently.
